Big Daddy wrote:How does it fare having the left side crawling down the wall and the other one unloaded? Do you have any L/R bias from the wall?
What power amplifiers/processing are you using?
They look badass!
Is Nick a musician?
Chad
Hi Chad and others reading along,
Even through a lot of hurdles to figure out, this turned out a killer end result, and most importantly, John told me Nick was very impressed with the end result.
Fortunately John was able to get in and take care of the side walls acoustically. There is 6" of absorption behind the fabric you see on the walls. Being slightly off-center is both good and bad. It tends to help reduce deep nulls in the upper bass response, but you then have to work a little harder to keep the left-right balance. The 13-15 deg angle inward on the 8" coaxial combined with its HF directivity left the upper frequency range very well matched between the channels from the start. The differences and room-related issues were mostly as we expected, below ~800Hz and above about 40Hz.
I know many were looking for measurements. I took over 300 measurements while in Green Bay, and found that I don't have a ton of "marketing quality" measurements as in-room you can't really measure full range with appropriate resolution or windowing. I do have a few good captures of some important qualitites though. Let's start with a 100Hz - 21kHz measurement taken at AE's shop while getting the crossovers and responses gellin' before we put them in the confines of the small room. Obviously there are some issues that come into play as the baffling is different in-room vs. what we were able to easily mock up, but with a baffle this wide, the midrange up was operating into 1/2 space.
Here is what many on the web like to show you, with ~1/3rd octave smoothing. This view is good to see general trends and is a good step back and check of what is going on:
Here is a look at the same measurement with 1/6th octave smoothing, which is pretty close to our upper frequency hearing acuity:
